<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Carson Sasser &#187; Building Codes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carsonsasser.com/category/building-codes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carsonsasser.com</link>
	<description>- generating more background noise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:14:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obscure Law Ensnares &quot;Damn Fools&quot; in Texas</title>
		<link>http://carsonsasser.com/2008/09/19/obscure-law-ensnares-damn-fools-in-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://carsonsasser.com/2008/09/19/obscure-law-ensnares-damn-fools-in-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Building Codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carsonsasser.com/2008/09/19/obscure-law-ensnares-damn-fools-in-texas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like some of the homes on Galveston Island beaches may not be rebuilt. The AP reports that a Texas law prohibits private buildings inside the average high-tide line. Beach erosion caused by Ike has moved a lot of private homes into that category. The law not only prohibits rebuilding of destroyed homes, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like some of the homes on Galveston Island beaches may not be rebuilt. The AP <a title="Some Ike Victims May Not Be Allowed to Rebuild" href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,425162,00.html" target="_blank">reports</a> that a Texas law prohibits private buildings inside the average high-tide line. Beach erosion caused by Ike has moved a lot of private homes into that category. The law not only prohibits rebuilding of destroyed homes, but requires undamaged homes to be demolished with little or no compensation to the owners. It is ironic that the owners of insured <em>destroyed</em> homes will be compensated by their insurers, but the owners of <em>undamaged</em> homes will likely get nothing. Apparently they will all lose their rights to the property.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what A.R. &#8220;Babe&#8221; Schwartz, the former state senator who wrote the law said about the affected homeowners:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We&#8217;re talking about damn fools that have built houses on the edge of the sea for as long as man could remember and against every advice anyone has given.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself &#8212; although I have tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://carsonsasser.com/2008/09/19/obscure-law-ensnares-damn-fools-in-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Nanny State Saved Me Today</title>
		<link>http://carsonsasser.com/2007/09/07/the-nanny-state-saved-me-today/</link>
		<comments>http://carsonsasser.com/2007/09/07/the-nanny-state-saved-me-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 00:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Building Codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanny State]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carsonsasser.com/2007/09/07/the-nanny-state-saved-me-today/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, the nanny state is on the job; it saved me from myself today. I ventured out with reckless abandon (at least I learned later that it was with reckless abandon) this morning on a trip to the local Lowe&#8217;s Home Improvement store to purchase a couple of doors for the new garage I&#8217;m building. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the nanny state is on the job; it saved me from myself today. I ventured out with reckless abandon (at least I learned later that it was with reckless abandon) this morning on a trip to the local Lowe&#8217;s Home Improvement store to purchase a couple of doors for the new garage I&#8217;m building. But that&#8217;s not the reckless part; the reckless part was that I intended to purchase and install doors with those nice sunset style windows across the top. But that is not going to happen. The Lowe&#8217;s clerk informed me that the state doesn&#8217;t allow them to sell garage doors with windows, and the state doesn&#8217;t allow me to install them. Silly me. I thought that how I decorated my garage doors would be pretty much up to me and my wife.</p>
<p>Why am I not allowed to have windows in my garage doors? Because I live in a designated 130-140 mph hurricane wind zone. I live about 25 miles inland from the Gulf of Mexico in Northwest Florida. Some bureaucrat has decided that it&#8217;s too dangerous for me to have the windows. Never mind that in my 67 year lifetime there have never been hurricane winds of more than about 110 mph where I live. Never mind that my garage is not even attached to my house. Never mind that no one is going to seek refuge in my garage during a hurricane. Never mind that well over half the garage doors in my town have windows. Never mind that it is alright with the state if I don&#8217;t even put doors on my garage. Never mind that it is alright with the state if people build carports with no walls. Never mind that it is alright with the state if I climb to the top of a tall tree to ride out a hurricane. Somehow the state has decided that it is just too risky for me to have that attractive row of windows across the top of my garage doors.</p>
<p>I tried to figure out the lobbying angle with this prohibition. Most building restrictions result from some trade group or company lobbying the legislature or the bureaucrats for rulings that will benefit them. But it&#8217;s not clear how that would play here; garage doors without windows cost <em>less</em> than doors with windows. I suppose it could be the insurance industry wanting to avoid some window replacement costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://carsonsasser.com/2007/09/07/the-nanny-state-saved-me-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
